Keyword summary
33%2 analyzed articles/videos1,655 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cincinnati Reds results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 2,524 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,620 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 14% (43,792 of 50,423 keywords). This Cincinnati Reds is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group.
Cincinnati Reds
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Cincinnati Reds attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Cincinnati Reds vs sitewide
Cincinnati Reds attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.