Keyword summary
8%1 analyzed article/video723 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinese Speaking Hackers results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 145 hits. Analysis detected 916 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 55% (22,999 of 50,453 keywords). This Chinese Speaking Hackers is worse (more manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group.
Chinese Speaking Hackers
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Chinese Speaking Hackers attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Chinese Speaking Hackers vs sitewide
Chinese Speaking Hackers attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.