Keyword summary
57%1 analyzed article/video912 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Developer results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 2,551 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 52% (25,434 of 52,714 keywords). This Chicago Developer is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group.
Chicago Developer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
52%Chicago Developer (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,648
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510051.8% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 10.7%10.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos