Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Central Valley Farmers results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 295 hits . Analysis detected 1,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,946 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 52,986 keywords). This Central Valley Farmers is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Central Valley Farmers
Keyword details
Total words: 2,946
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst