Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ceddanne Rafaela results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Recency Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 2,025 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 57,945 keywords). This Ceddanne Rafaela is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ceddanne Rafaela
Keyword details
Total words: 3,420
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst