Keyword summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adversaries results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 248 hits . Analysis detected 1,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 62% (22,618 of 58,127 keywords). This Adversaries is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Adversaries
Keyword details
Total words: 2,324
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst