Author summary
8% 2 analyzed articles/videos 687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scott Nishimura results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Availability Heuristic , and Representativeness Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 311 hits . Analysis detected 1,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 9% (8,262 of 9,043 authors). This Scott Nishimura is better (less manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group. Scott Nishimura
Author details
Total words: 5,224
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.6% percentile 1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.5% Indoctrination: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst