Author summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video1,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathaniel Janowitz results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.8% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 552 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,183 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠16% (7,341 of 8,706 authors). This Nathaniel Janowitz is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group.
Nathaniel Janowitz
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠16%Nathaniel Janowitz (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,183
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

16% percentile
025507510015.7% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos