Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Natalie Pate results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 2.7% saturation with 63 hits. Analysis detected 369 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,332 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Natalie Pate is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Natalie Pate
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Natalie Pate attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Natalie Pate vs sitewide
Natalie Pate attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.