Author summary
ā 14%1 analyzed article/video1,572 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim Zetter results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Halo Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 379 hits. Analysis detected 2,039 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,288 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ā 11% (7,572 of 8,430 authors). This Kim Zetter is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Kim Zetter
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Hannah Martin1%
ā 0%Paul DeMark1%
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Michael Fox1%
ā 0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
ā 11%Kim Zetter (selected)2%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,288
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Kim Zetter attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Kim Zetter vs sitewide
Kim Zetter attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos