Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kamal Nahas results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 1,755 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,541 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 5,314 authors). This Kamal Nahas is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Kamal Nahas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Kamal Nahas (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,541
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Kamal Nahas attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Kamal Nahas vs sitewide
Kamal Nahas attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos