Author summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jarrid Denney results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Recency Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 751 hits. Analysis detected 2,463 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (5,180 of 8,461 authors). This Jarrid Denney is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Jarrid Denney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠39%Jarrid Denney (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,040
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jarrid Denney attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jarrid Denney vs sitewide
Jarrid Denney attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos