Author summary
⁠26%1 analyzed article/video973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane M. Von Bergen results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 1,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,919 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (4,783 of 6,398 authors). This Jane M. Von Bergen is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Jane M. Von Bergen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠26%Jane M. Von Bergen (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,919
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jane M. Von Bergen attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jane M. Von Bergen vs sitewide
Jane M. Von Bergen attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos