Author summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Nagel results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 183 hits. Analysis detected 949 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (1,398 of 5,885 authors). This Jacob Nagel is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group.
Jacob Nagel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠77%Jacob Nagel (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,125
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Jacob Nagel attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Jacob Nagel vs sitewide
Jacob Nagel attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos