Author summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ira Winderman results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 784 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,746 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (3,277 of 6,119 authors). This Ira Winderman is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Ira Winderman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠47%Ira Winderman (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,746
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ira Winderman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ira Winderman vs sitewide
Ira Winderman attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos