Publication summary
⁠20%1 analyzed article/video649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orlando Sentinel results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 819 hits. Analysis detected 8,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,803 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (211 of 339 publications). This Orlando Sentinel is better (less manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Orlando Sentinel
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%Brookings1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠1%Berkeleyside2%
⁠2%The Colorado Sun2%
⁠38%Orlando Sentinel (selected)2%
⁠99%KESQ9%
⁠100%The White House9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 10,803
Article count: 4
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Orlando Sentinel attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Orlando Sentinel vs sitewide
Orlando Sentinel attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos