Publication summary
⁠63%5 analyzed articles/videos3,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orlando Sentinel results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 819 hits. Analysis detected 8,395 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,328 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (221 of 341 publications). This Orlando Sentinel is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Orlando Sentinel
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%Brookings1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠1%The Colorado Sun2%
⁠2%Berkeleyside2%
⁠36%Orlando Sentinel (selected)2%
⁠99%KESQ9%
⁠100%The White House9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Orlando Sentinel attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Orlando Sentinel vs sitewide
Orlando Sentinel attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos