Author summary
ā 92%1 analyzed article/video376 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Events Staff results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 41.8% saturation with 628 hits. Analysis detected 2,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,504 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of ā 91% (627 of 6,730 authors). This Human Events Staff is worse (more manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group.
Human Events Staff
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Cleveland Documenters1%
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Sneha Dey1%
ā 1%Ideastream Public Media1%
ā 91%Human Events Staff (selected)8%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,504
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Human Events Staff attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Human Events Staff vs sitewide
Human Events Staff attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos