Author summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Hala Al Shami results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 175 faulty-reasoning hits from 266 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 9,274 authors). This Hala Al Shami is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hala Al Shami
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Hannah Martin1%
ā 0%Paul DeMark1%
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Michael Fox1%
ā 0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
ā 100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
ā 0%Hala Al Shami (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 266
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles266 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 29.3%29.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 12.0%12.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 8.7%8.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 29.3%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos