Author summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video839 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Nicholson results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 581 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,678 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (1,443 of 6,949 authors). This Emma Nicholson is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Emma Nicholson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%T. Christian Miller1%
⁠0%Ken Armstrong1%
⁠1%Franziska Wild1%
⁠80%Emma Nicholson (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,678
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Emma Nicholson attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Emma Nicholson vs sitewide
Emma Nicholson attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos