Author summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video450 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doug Reardon results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 242 hits. Analysis detected 1,300 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,350 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (1,358 of 6,215 authors). This Doug Reardon is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Doug Reardon
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠79%Doug Reardon (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,350
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Doug Reardon attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Doug Reardon vs sitewide
Doug Reardon attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos