Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Dan Keemahill results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 0.7% saturation with 122 hits. Analysis detected 521 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 6,130 authors). This Dan Keemahill is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Dan Keemahill
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%Dan Keemahill (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 18,368
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Dan Keemahill attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Dan Keemahill vs sitewide
Dan Keemahill attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos