Author summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 1,356 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Fritsch results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 809 hits . Analysis detected 5,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,424 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (3,263 of 9,074 authors). This Brian Fritsch is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Brian Fritsch
Author details
Total words: 5,424
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.9% 14.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 13.7% 13.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst