Author summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Benjamin Stephen results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 778 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,060 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠87% (1,031 of 7,658 authors). This Benjamin Stephen is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Benjamin Stephen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Cleveland Documenters1%
⁠0%T. Christian Miller1%
⁠0%Ken Armstrong1%
⁠1%Brenna Ehrlich1%
⁠87%Benjamin Stephen (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,060
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Benjamin Stephen attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Benjamin Stephen vs sitewide
Benjamin Stephen attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos