Author summary
36%1 analyzed article/video943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amelia Schafer results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 367 hits. Analysis detected 1,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,829 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (2,983 of 5,625 authors). This Amelia Schafer is better (less manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Amelia Schafer
Author details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Amelia Schafer attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Amelia Schafer vs sitewide
Amelia Schafer attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.