Townhall92%

Government Shutdown Avoided? Here's What to Know 68%

By Cameron Arcand89%

8/3/2026, 11:08:54 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 917 faulty-reasoning hits from 451 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 54.7% and a BS Rank of 68% (8,753 of 27,320 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.00% of the article peer group.

Senate Appropriations Cmte. 
Chair Susan Collins (R-ME) announced Sunday that a bipartisan deal was reached in the upper chamber to temporarily fund the government through December 11 via a Continuing Resolution (CR). 
The bill will have to pass through the Senate and House before it heads to President Donald Trump’s desk. 
“This CR is straightforward,” Collins said in a Sunday statement. 
“It continues current government funding levels until December 11th and includes necessary adjustments for programs like the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), vital national security programs, including shipbuilding across multiple vessels, and the Disaster Relief Fund,” she continued, adding that it “also avoids any poison pills.” 
The CR proposal was also well-received by Democrats, including Cmte. 
Vice Chair Patty Murray (D-WA) wrote in a statement that the “bill includes important extensions and language that House Republicans’ CR did not, and it rejects Trump’s frivolous war spending wish list.” 
“Importantly, we closed the loophole in House Republicans’ CR that would have allowed the Trump administration to transfer funding provided for other programs to Border Patrol, which desperately needs reform, not more money,” she added. 
Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) touted the passage of a Republican-backed CR last month, but Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) said the best course for success would be to work with Democrats in the Senate as well. 
The House proposal would have also funded the government through early December, and it's unclear if a bipartisan Senate CR will get pushback in the lower chamber. 
“House and Senate Rs are on the same page on govt funding  on length, desire for clean CR, & motivation to complete our work before the deadline. 
It’s simply a matter of adding the anomalies that the WH has requested. 
Bipartisan effort underway to accomplish all of these things,” Thune spokesman Ryan Wrasse posted to X on July 22. 
The government will shut down on Sept. 30 if a spending plan does not land on Trump’s desk in time. 
“The White House's stance is that the government needs to be funded. 
This president and Republicans on Capitol Hill from both chambers, as you just mentioned, the House and the Senate Republicans want to keep the government open,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told Townhall on July 23. 
There was a 43-day government shutdown last fall, followed by months-long Department of Homeland Security shutdown, this spring. 
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? 
Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.9%Cameron Arcand: 2.6%Townhall: 5.1%Confirmation Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 2.2%Townhall: 2.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.3%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.1%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Cameron Arcand: 4.3%Townhall: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias5.1%This article: 0.7%Cameron Arcand: 13.5%Townhall: 9.9%Framing Effect0.7%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.5%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 11.3%Cameron Arcand: 1.1%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias11.3%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.4%Cameron Arcand: 2.0%Townhall: 1.3%Optimism Bias10.4%This article: 6.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.7%Townhall: 1.7%Pessimism Bias6.0%This article: 19.3%Cameron Arcand: 12.2%Townhall: 12.9%Negativity Bias19.3%This article: 8.2%Cameron Arcand: 5.2%Townhall: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias8.2%This article: 7.8%Cameron Arcand: 0.8%Townhall: 1.8%Fundamental Attribution Error7.8%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.6%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 21.5%Cameron Arcand: 3.7%Townhall: 4.2%In-Group Bias21.5%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.9%Townhall: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.7%Townhall: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.6%Townhall: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.0%Cameron Arcand: 2.4%Townhall: 1.2%Recency Bias4.0%This article: 8.2%Cameron Arcand: 0.7%Townhall: 0.5%Primacy Effect8.2%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 3.4%Townhall: 5.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 7.8%Cameron Arcand: 0.4%Townhall: 1.9%Straw Man7.8%This article: 8.2%Cameron Arcand: 4.5%Townhall: 3.8%Appeal to Authority8.2%This article: 18.6%Cameron Arcand: 2.4%Townhall: 1.8%False Dilemma18.6%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.1%Townhall: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 2.4%Townhall: 8.9%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 1.3%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 6.2%Cameron Arcand: 1.4%Townhall: 1.2%Bandwagon6.2%This article: 13.7%Cameron Arcand: 11.0%Townhall: 10.2%Appeal to Emotion13.7%This article: 2.7%Cameron Arcand: 2.7%Townhall: 2.0%Begging the Question2.7%This article: 4.0%Cameron Arcand: 3.0%Townhall: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.7%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.3%Townhall: 1.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.6%Townhall: 1.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.4%Cameron Arcand: 2.6%Townhall: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.4%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.8%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 4.6%Townhall: 3.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 5.0%Townhall: 2.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.8%Cameron Arcand: 6.5%Townhall: 15.1%Biased Writer Voice3.8%This article: 2.9%Cameron Arcand: 3.2%Townhall: 4.9%Indoctrination2.9%This article: 0.0%Cameron Arcand: 0.0%Townhall: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Cameron Arcand: 5.3%Townhall: 13.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.8%This article: 6.0%Cameron Arcand: 4.5%Townhall: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.0%

451 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers54%attributed speech208writer words
Selected voice

Karoline Leavitt

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words20% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -13.0 ptsWriter: 13.0%Karoline Leavitt: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Karoline Leavitt: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Karoline Leavitt: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.3 ptsWriter: 6.3%Karoline Leavitt: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.