Topic summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video451 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bipartisan Deal results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, In-Group Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 191 hits. Analysis detected 1,708 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (6,752 of 22,343 topics). This Bipartisan Deal is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Bipartisan Deal
Topic details
Total words: 1,804
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510069.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.3%5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos