Jed Hoyer gets aggressive at trade deadline, deals prospects with Cubs’ present in mind: ‘We’re here to win’ 55%

By Vinnie Duber41%

8/3/2026, 5:40:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Recency Bias, and Sunk Cost Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 209 hits. Analysis detected 928 faulty-reasoning hits from 840 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.7% and a BS Rank of 55% (13,196 of 29,328 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the article peer group.

A year ago, the Cubs  didn’t make a big splash at the trade deadline . 
Jed Hoyer’s front office saw the price of pitching and didn’t want to part with its top prospects, a decision that loomed large in hindsight, when pitching-depth issues helped the Cubs to an earlier-than-hoped playoff exit. 
This year? 
Well, the same result won’t be for a lack of trying. 
Hoyer & Co. went big this time around, parting with a half dozen of its top prospects  including No. 2 ranked infielder Jefferson Rojas, the No. 68 prospect in baseball  to bring in a trio of pitchers that can help the Cubs immediately. 
And, they hope, come October. 
“Ideally, you don’t trade prospects,” Hoyer said after the deadline passed Monday. 
“But at the same time, we’re here to win.” 
Cubs upgrade bullpen with Ryan Zeferjahn, give up Moises Ballesteros in trade with Angels 
Cubs continue to bolster rotation, net Clay Holmes in swap with Mets 
Rojas was the cost of acquiring starting pitcher Clay Holmes and reserve outfielder Tyrone Taylor from the Mets. 
The front office shipped away a quintet of top-30 prospects in trades for starter Kevin Gausman , reliever Ryan Zeferjahn and minor league starter Braxton Garrett, also parting with young slugger Moises Ballesteros in the Zeferjahn deal . 
The two headlining acquisitions  rotation adds Gausman and Holmes  seem unlikely to be Cubs past the end of this season (Gausman’s contract is up, while Holmes has a player option), making Hoyer’s aggression all the more notable. 
This goes back to the offseason, when the front office broke with the narrative by dealing outfield prospect Owen Caissie for starting pitcher Edward Cabrera and handing out a big-money, free-agent deal to third baseman Alex Bregman. 
Combine those moves with the ones at the deadline, and the Cubs have acted on the belief that this team can win, win big and win right now. 
“We’ve invested a lot in this roster, not just financially but in terms of how we put the roster together. 
It’s a really good team,” Hoyer said. 
“That’s part of being in contention and being in a good position. 
You have to make those decisions. 
You have to draft well, you have to develop well, and if you do those things, then you can afford to make those kinds of trades.” 
Now it’s time to find out if the aggression will pay off. 
Gausman, a two-time All Star, brings a milelong track record of big league success to the North Side, perhaps highlighted by the big innings he pitched for the Blue Jays as they fell just short of winning the World Series last October. 
Holmes is a two-time All-Star reliever turned effective starter who had a 3.26 ERA in his season and a half with the Mets. 
He’s been out since May recovering from a fractured fibula but is nearing a return, with three minor league rehab starts in the last week and a half. 
Zeferjahn adds to what’s been an injury-decimated Cubs bullpen, with a 1.38 ERA in his last 24 appearances since June 1. 
He was almost exclusively a late-inning arm for the Angels and figures to get those sorts of opportunities moving forward. 
Taylor fits the bill of a righty bat off the bench, which Hoyer said was specifically requested by manager Craig Counsell with utility man Matt Shaw still nursing a lingering hand injury. 
And Garrett, who made 30 effective starts for the Marlins in 2023, is a depth piece in the minor leagues (already sent to Triple-A Iowa) who could be helpful this year and into the future. 
There are two months of regular-season baseball left  and, the Cubs hope, a month of postseason baseball after that  to find out if stepping on the gas in early August wins the race for this team. 
The Brewers still hold a lead in the NL Central. 
And the in-town Dodgers are as tall a task to overcome as you’ll find, commanding as the back-to-back champs. 
But Hoyer did his work at the deadline and reinforced a team that already owned one of the sport’s best records. 
“In some ways, we were as focused as I can remember at a deadline,” he said. 
“It was very clear we needed to add pitching . 
 We wanted to add reinforcements, and we certainly did that.” 
He was twice an All-Star as a reliever, in 2022 and 2024, when he pitched for the Yankees. 
He logged 165⅔ innings in his first season as a big league starter last year. 
Zeferjahn has been very effective this season, already logging 51⅔ relief innings and posting a 3.66 ERA. 
He’s been even better over the last couple months, with a microscopic 1.38 ERA in 24 appearances since June 1. 
Pete Crow-Armstrong's refined approach continues impressing Cubs manager Craig Counsell 
Crow-Armstrong walked three times Sunday, seeing 25 pitches during those at-bats. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.3%Vinnie Duber: 1.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.5%Confirmation Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Vinnie Duber: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Availability Heuristic6.3%This article: 12.0%Vinnie Duber: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic12.0%This article: 4.3%Vinnie Duber: 3.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Hindsight Bias4.3%This article: 5.5%Vinnie Duber: 2.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias5.5%This article: 3.2%Vinnie Duber: 2.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.8%Framing Effect3.2%This article: 1.4%Vinnie Duber: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Loss Aversion1.4%This article: 1.4%Vinnie Duber: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Status Quo Bias1.4%This article: 7.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect7.0%This article: 24.9%Vinnie Duber: 9.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.3%Optimism Bias24.9%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Vinnie Duber: 2.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 6.5%Negativity Bias2.3%This article: 5.4%Vinnie Duber: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Vinnie Duber: 3.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Halo Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.5%Vinnie Duber: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.3%Recency Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.3%Vinnie Duber: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.1%Appeal to Authority2.3%This article: 3.1%Vinnie Duber: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.2%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 2.3%Vinnie Duber: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning2.3%This article: 1.3%Vinnie Duber: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.6%Hasty Generalization1.3%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.3%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.3%Vinnie Duber: 1.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.3%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Anecdotal5.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.3%Vinnie Duber: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.3%Unattributed Quote1.3%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Vinnie Duber: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

840 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker15%attributed speech711writer words
Selected voice

Jed Hoyer

95%flagged-word coverage
129 attributed words100% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote+8.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jed Hoyer: 8.5%8.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.