OPB14%

Wildfire smoke becomes a regular occurrence across Oregon, as residents learn to adapt 46%

By Joni Auden Land13% Amanda Linares59%

8/5/2026, 5:51:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Overconfidence Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 693 faulty-reasoning hits from 616 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of 46% (16,781 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.90% of the article peer group.

Wildfire smoke continued to blanket much of Oregon on Wednesday, a result of several fires burning across the Pacific Northwest. 
All but two counties in Oregon were under some sort of air quality advisory as of Wednesday afternoon. 
And it’s part of a yearslong trend. 
For the past decade, nearly every region of Oregon has seen an increase in wildfires and smoke as a result. 
Communities that rarely saw smoke at the start of the 21st century now see at least several days of smoke per year, according to a study by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. 
Ali Mirzakhalili, the air quality administrator for the DEQ, said Wednesday that the impacts of climate change  less rain combined with hotter summers  have led to more widespread fires and smoke. 
“We think the patterns of the past have changed,” Mirzakhalili said. 
“We’re going to have to deal with an increased number of smoky days. 
The wildfire seasons are starting earlier and lasting longer and spreading farther.” 
Every city included in the study has seen a large uptick in the number of days with unhealthy air. 
Bend, for example, had 10 days from 2000 to 2015 with air considered unhealthy for sensitive groups. 
In the last 10 years, that number has jumped to 97. 
Mirzakhalili said that while the Willamette Valley used to be spared the worst effects of wildfire season, that’s no longer the case. 
Since 2016, Portland has had five times the number of days with unhealthy smoke, compared to the previous decade. 
“No area in the country is protected from smoke,” he said, referring to smoky conditions in places from Boston to Minnesota. 
Some Oregon cities are experiencing extremely poor air quality. 
Prineville in Central Oregon has an air quality index of 439 as of 4 p.m. 
Anything above 300 is considered hazardous to human health. 
And that’s forced many camps and other activities to shut down until the smoke clears. 
Camp Namanu, a 103-year-old summer camp located near the base of Mount Hood, sent campers home early on Tuesday due to the smoke. 
Executive Director Gina Sander said it became clear almost immediately that it would be impossible to have normal outdoor activities for the week. 
“The skies were orange, the sun had that spooky, haunting glow to it, and the [air quality index] levels were solidly in the unhealthy category,” Sander said. 
The decision was made to send the children home early, rather than keep them indoors for the entire week. 
Sander said they typically expect smokier conditions in September. 
“It’s hard because this is the first time I’ve seen the AQI be so bad at this time of year,” she said. 
“Is this the new normal or is this just a really bad year?” 
Wildfire smoke contains several different chemicals that can be dangerous to a person’s health, with particles that can easily enter someone’s lungs and bloodstream. 
Gabriela Goldfarb of the Oregon Health Authority said hospitals across the state are reporting an increase in smoke-related visits in the past few days. 
Portlanders might see a reprieve sooner than others. 
Noah Alviz, a meteorologist with the National Weather Service in Portland, said a wind shift coming from the west will help push smoke back out east starting as early as Wednesday night. 
“But not all the smoke is going to go away all at once,” he said. 
“It’s going to be a gradual process.” 
Much of the wildfire smoke across western Oregon is expected to clear out Thursday night, although the eastern parts of the state will likely still have smoky skies through the weekend, Alviz said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.1%Joni Auden Land: 0.5%Associated Press: 1.1%Confirmation Bias2.1%This article: 4.5%Joni Auden Land: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.4%Anchoring Bias4.5%This article: 10.4%Joni Auden Land: 2.4%Associated Press: 1.8%Availability Heuristic10.4%This article: 2.9%Joni Auden Land: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic2.9%This article: 3.7%Joni Auden Land: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Hindsight Bias3.7%This article: 10.6%Joni Auden Land: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.9%Associated Press: 2.8%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.7%Joni Auden Land: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.3%Joni Auden Land: 1.3%Associated Press: 2.0%Optimism Bias1.3%This article: 4.2%Joni Auden Land: 0.8%Associated Press: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 14.9%Joni Auden Land: 3.2%Associated Press: 4.6%Negativity Bias14.9%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.1%Joni Auden Land: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.7%Recency Bias8.1%This article: 1.5%Joni Auden Land: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Primacy Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.4%Joni Auden Land: 1.8%Associated Press: 2.0%Appeal to Authority14.4%This article: 2.1%Joni Auden Land: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.8%False Dilemma2.1%This article: 2.4%Joni Auden Land: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope2.4%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.5%Joni Auden Land: 3.1%Associated Press: 1.7%Hasty Generalization6.5%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.4%Joni Auden Land: 1.5%Associated Press: 2.3%Appeal to Emotion4.4%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.4%Joni Auden Land: 1.1%Associated Press: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.4%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.3%Joni Auden Land: 2.5%Associated Press: 1.1%Anecdotal7.3%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 1.8%Associated Press: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 1.0%Associated Press: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joni Auden Land: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

616 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers60%attributed speech247writer words
Selected voice

Gabriela Goldfarb

100%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words6.5% of attributed speech88% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.