Author summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 616 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Linares results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 167 hits . Analysis detected 1,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 51% (4,666 of 9,471 authors). This Amanda Linares is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. Amanda Linares
Author details
Total words: 2,464
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.9% 3.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst