The public demanded data center news, and Wisconsin Watch is delivering 65%

By Tom Kertscher82% Wisconsin Watch11%

7/22/2026, 12:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 466 faulty-reasoning hits from 313 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (7,073 of 19,839 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the article peer group.

For six months now, Wisconsin Watch has made a concerted effort to report on data centers. 
We’re publishing major stories at WisconsinWatch.org and, each Monday, we provide data center news nuggets in our Forward newsletter ( subscribe here ). 
Here’s a month-by-month summary of what we’ve reported. 
January: Wisconsin Watch revealed that officials in at least four Wisconsin communities (the number has since grown) signed nondisclosure agreements that hid details of billion-dollar data center proposals from the public. 
February: We detailed how a $1 billion data center is being proposed for Grant County in the Driftless Area of southwest Wisconsin. 
March: In a sign of the impact of artificial intelligence data centers, we reported that just three Wisconsin companies have done more than $1 billion in business supplying the facilities. 
We also disclosed more NDAs and other ways local governments have tried to keep data center details secret . 
April: We were the first to report on an official estimate that state government will forgo $2 billion in revenue because of a sales tax exemption for data centers that was adopted in 2023. 
June: We spent months gathering behind-the-scenes details on what happened to the Driftless Area proposal. 
July: We detailed how land sales for the data center under construction in Port Washington turned homeowners and farmers into millionaires and, in some cases, created generation-changing wealth. 
More stories are in the works. 
If you have suggestions for future data center coverage, please let me know: tkertscher@wisconsinwatch.org . 
Wisconsin Watch is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom. 
Subscribe to our newsletters for original stories and our Friday news roundup. 
The public demanded data center news, and Wisconsin Watch is delivering is a post from Wisconsin Watch , a non-profit investigative news site covering Wisconsin since 2009. 
Please consider making a contribution to support our journalism. 
Confirmation Bias
8.6%
Anchoring Bias
0%
Availability Heuristic
13.1%
Representativeness Heuristic
0%
Hindsight Bias
0%
Overconfidence Bias
0%
Framing Effect
9.6%
Loss Aversion
0%
Status Quo Bias
0%
Sunk Cost Effect
0%
Optimism Bias
1.9%
Pessimism Bias
0%
Negativity Bias
24.9%
Self-Serving Bias
7.3%
Fundamental Attribution Error
0%
Actor-Observer Bias
0%
In-Group Bias
0%
Out-Group Homogeneity Bias
0%
Halo Effect
2.2%
Horn Effect
0%
Dunning-Kruger Effect
0%
Recency Bias
0%
Primacy Effect
10.9%
Blind-Spot Bias
0%
Ad Hominem
0%
Straw Man
0%
Appeal to Authority
13.1%
False Dilemma
0%
Slippery Slope
0%
Circular Reasoning
0%
Hasty Generalization
18.8%
Red Herring
0%
Bandwagon
0%
Appeal to Emotion
0%
Begging the Question
0%
Post Hoc (False Cause)
9.6%
Tu Quoque
0%
Burden of Proof
0%
Appeal to Nature
0%
Composition/Division
0%
Anecdotal
0%
No True Scotsman
0%
Ambiguity (Equivocation)
6.1%
Gambler’s Fallacy
0%
Middle Ground
0%
Personal Incredulity
0%
Special Pleading
0%
Genetic Fallacy
0%
Unattributed Quote
0%
Quote-first Misdirection
0%
Biased Writer Voice
8.6%
Indoctrination
0%
Politically Left Leaning Bias
0%
Politically Right Leaning Bias
0%
Attempt to Sell a Product or Service
14.1%

313 words analyzed.

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.