Topic summary
⁠33%2 analyzed articles/videos1,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zoning And Land Use results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Slippery Slope as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 429 hits. Analysis detected 2,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,359 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (19,458 of 24,545 topics). This Zoning And Land Use is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group.
Zoning And Land Use
Topic details
Total words: 6,359
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

21% percentile
025507510020.7% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.8%6.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos