Topic summary
8%1 analyzed article/video167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wta Tour results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Recency Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 165 faulty-reasoning hits from 668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 63% (7,998 of 21,105 topics). This Wta Tour is worse (more manipulative) than 62.10% of the peer group.
Wta Tour
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wta Tour attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wta Tour vs sitewide
Wta Tour attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.