Topic summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video702 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wrongful Termination results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 160 hits. Analysis detected 1,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (16,232 of 21,665 topics). This Wrongful Termination is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
Wrongful Termination
Topic details
Total words: 2,808
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.1% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.7%Composition/Division: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos