Topic summary
⁠45%2 analyzed articles/videos1,007 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wrongful Death results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Hindsight Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 2,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,028 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (12,856 of 21,634 topics). This Wrongful Death is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Wrongful Death
Topic details
Total words: 4,028
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.6% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.0%5.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 5.3%5.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Special Pleading: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos