Author summary
⁠4%1 analyzed article/video1,241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St. John Barned-Smith results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 478 hits. Analysis detected 2,067 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (4,077 of 5,148 authors). This St. John Barned-Smith is better (less manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
St. John Barned-Smith
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠21%St. John Barned-Smith (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,964
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
St. John Barned-Smith attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
St. John Barned-Smith vs sitewide
St. John Barned-Smith attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos