Topic summary
47%1 analyzed article/video1,050 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Heritage Sites results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 198 hits. Analysis detected 2,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,150 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 32% (9,755 of 14,167 topics). This World Heritage Sites is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
World Heritage Sites
Topic details
Total words: 3,150
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
World Heritage Sites attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
World Heritage Sites vs sitewide
World Heritage Sites attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos