Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Work Hours results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Straw Man, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 219 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,790 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,536 topics). This Work Hours is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Work Hours
Topic details
Total words: 1,790
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos