Topic summary
35%1 analyzed article/video666 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women's World Cup results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 934 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,998 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (9,919 of 14,904 topics). This Women's World Cup is better (less manipulative) than 66.60% of the peer group.
Women's World Cup
Topic details
Total words: 1,998
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Women's World Cup attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Women's World Cup vs sitewide
Women's World Cup attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos