Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,784 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Women's Hockey results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,319 hits. Analysis detected 5,086 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,136 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 37% (8,275 of 13,019 topics). This Women's Hockey is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Women's Hockey
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Women's Hockey attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Women's Hockey vs sitewide
Women's Hockey attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.