BS Summary: These Wildlife Conservation results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 2,306 hits. Analysis detected 25,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,886 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 7% (10,149 of 10,867 topics). This Wildlife Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Wildlife Conservation
Topic details
Total words: 40,886
Article count: 9
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wildlife Conservation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wildlife Conservation vs All Other Publications
Wildlife Conservation attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.