Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video1,086 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfire Response results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 525 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,258 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (17,555 of 22,702 topics). This Wildfire Response is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Wildfire Response
Topic details
Total words: 3,258
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.7% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos