Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Affairs results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anchoring Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 718 hits. Analysis detected 2,446 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,525 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 37% (8,218 of 13,023 topics). This White House Affairs is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
White House Affairs
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
White House Affairs attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
White House Affairs vs sitewide
White House Affairs attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.