Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,060 analyzed words
BS Summary: These War-With-Iran results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 511 hits. Analysis detected 3,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 51% (6,459 of 13,023 topics). This War-With-Iran is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
War-With-Iran
Topic details
Total words: 4,240
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
War-With-Iran attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
War-With-Iran vs sitewide
War-With-Iran attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.