Topic summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wage Theft Lawsuits results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 327 hits. Analysis detected 1,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (12,855 of 24,545 topics). This Wage Theft Lawsuits is better (less manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group.
Wage Theft Lawsuits
Topic details
Total words: 2,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Tu Quoque: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos