Topic summary

⁠17%1 analyzed article/video1,217 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Vision Science results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Burden of Proof, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 360 hits. Analysis detected 2,622 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,651 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (8,738 of 14,359 topics). This Vision Science is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.

Vision Science

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠0%	Terms Of Use	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠40%	Vision Science (selected)	3%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,651

Article count: 1

Authors

Scott Travers

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Vision Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Vision Science vs sitewide

Vision Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

Why Some Women Might More Colors Than Everyone Else? A Biologist Explains⁠^27%

Forbes⁠^44%By Scott Travers⁠^8%7/20/2026, 12:30:59 PM