Topic summary
⁠15%2 analyzed articles/videos1,019 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanderpump Rules results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, False Dilemma, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 1,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,539 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (22,064 of 24,413 topics). This Vanderpump Rules is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Vanderpump Rules
Topic details
Total words: 3,539
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

10% percentile
02550751009.6% percentile
1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Horn Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.0%Red Herring: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos