Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video902 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Energy Policy results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 450 hits. Analysis detected 3,371 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 37% (8,271 of 13,018 topics). This Utah Energy Policy is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Utah Energy Policy
Topic details
Total words: 3,608
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Utah Energy Policy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Utah Energy Policy vs sitewide
Utah Energy Policy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos