Topic summary

⁠0%1 analyzed article/video

BS Summary: These US China Trade Relations results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 825 hits. Analysis detected 6,716 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,834 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 14,310 topics). This US China Trade Relations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.

US China Trade Relations

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠0%	Terms Of Use	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%
⁠0%	US China Trade Relations (selected)	0%

Topic details

Total words: 9,834

Article count: 1

Authors

Frances Dinkelspiel

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

US China Trade Relations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

US China Trade Relations vs sitewide

US China Trade Relations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

‘Technofantasy’ or ‘eureka’?: Berkeley’s $3 billion AI mining company⁠^41%

The Oaklandside⁠^5%By Frances Dinkelspiel⁠^0%7/14/2026, 5:14:39 PM