Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video1,371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Negotiations results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 430 hits. Analysis detected 3,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ā 22% (10,153 of 13,018 topics). This University Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
University Negotiations
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
University Negotiations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
University Negotiations vs sitewide
University Negotiations attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.